Energia Eolica a Jūrmala
Rendimento annuo
13.140
kWh/year
Periodo di ammortamento
not reached
Riduzione CO₂
0.9
t CO₂/year
Esempio: impianto da 10 kW, valori medi del paese
Domande frequenti su Jūrmala
Quanta energia produce una turbina eolica da 10 kW a Jūrmala?
Con un fattore di capacità del 15 %, una turbina da 10 kW a Jūrmala produce circa 13140 kWh all'anno.
Quanto costa una piccola turbina eolica in Jūrmala?
Una turbina da 10 kW in Jūrmala costa circa 40,000 € installazione inclusa.
Qual è il periodo di ammortamento di una turbina eolica a Jūrmala?
Given local wind conditions, the investment is not paid back within the 20-year horizon of this example calculation.
Quanta CO₂ risparmia una turbina eolica a Jūrmala ogni anno?
Una turbina da 10 kW a Jūrmala evita circa 0.9 t di CO₂ all'anno.
Assumptions and provenance
This example calculation is disclosed in full. Every quantity below enters the figures above exactly as stated — a specialist can recompute them or substitute their own assumptions.
- Payback (cumulative)
- not reached in 20 years
- Payback (discounted)
- not reached in 20 years
- Payback (static)
- —
Sum of the nominal annual net benefits, including degradation, price escalation and replacement costs — not discounted. This is the figure shown above.
The same cash flows, discounted at the nominal rate the net present value uses. Always the later of the two.
Investment divided by the first year's benefit — without price escalation, degradation or replacement costs. Many quotes use this; depending on the assumptions it comes out shorter or longer.
| Quantity | Value | Source / note |
|---|---|---|
| System size | 10 kW | Example system of this page |
| Investment | 40.000 € (4000 €/kW) | IEA Wind TCP Task 27 / WindEurope: 3.000–6.000 €/kW installiert für Kleinwind, Mittelwert bei 10 kW |
| Operating cost | 1200 €/a | — |
| Electricity price | 0,220 EUR/kWh | Eurostat nrg_pc_204, Band DC, 2025-S2 |
| Feed-in tariff | 0,0550 EUR/kWh | — |
| Self-consumption share | 20 % | Wind generates at night and in winter — the share is structurally below that of solar. |
| Degradation | 0,5 %/a | — |
| Price escalation | 2,0 %/a | — |
| Discount rate | 3,0 %/a | Nominal, matching the nominally escalating revenues |
| Horizon | 20 years | — |
| Grid CO₂ factor | 70 g/kWh | EEA, greenhouse gas emission intensity of electricity generation (seed), 2023 |
| Wind speed (data source) | 7,12 m/s | Annual mean at 50 m reference height |
| Wind speed (hub height) | 5,34 m/s | Logarithmic wind profile, converted to 15 m |
| Hub height | 15 m | — |
| Terrain | Suburban | z₀ = 0.4 m |
| Weibull shape parameter k | 2,00 | — |
| Air density | 1,247 kg/m³ | — |
| Capacity factor | 15,0 % net | Gross 19,8 %, less 16 % losses · capped at 15 %, the loss chain gave 16,6 % — a deliberately conservative screening assumption |
Data source: not recorded with this cached figure. Wind comes from the New European Wind Atlas, or from NASA POWER outside its coverage; which of the two produced this number was not stored alongside it, and it is not assigned retrospectively.
Non-binding initial assessment for an example system, not professional advice. Small wind requires an on-site wind measurement before any investment decision.